CanRun

RTX 5060 Ti 8GB vs RTX 5060 Ti 16GB for local LLMs

Assumes 32 GB of DDR5-5600 system RAM, Windows with this GPU driving the display, 8k context and an f16 KV cache.

What to know before choosing

Both cards use the same chip and memory bandwidth, so speed estimates match whenever a model fits in 8GB. CanRun counts 7.4 GB usable on the 8GB card, 15.4 GB on the 16GB card. Qwen3 8B runs great on both, with little margin on the 8GB card (check ollama ps). Gemma 4 12B outgrows the 8GB card, but with most of it on the GPU it runs well. Gemma 3 12B spills further and runs slowly there, as does Phi-4, which needs 11.0 GB. Both run great on the 16GB card. Both are sold as "RTX 5060 Ti", so check the memory size.

MoE models make system RAM matter too. gpt-oss-20b fits fully only on the 16GB card, a pairing in the public benchmarks below. On the 8GB card some experts go to system RAM; it runs well, a theoretical estimate (±30%). With 32GB of system RAM, Qwen3 30B-A3B (2507) runs well on both (theoretical). With only 16GB of RAM it won't run on the 8GB card, yet the 16GB card runs it well (theoretical).

At 16k with an f16 KV cache, Qwen3 8B needs 7.7 GB, so the 8GB card moves part of it to system RAM. A q8_0 KV cache keeps it on the GPU, and the 16GB card holds 32k fully.

Speed

The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB generate text at about the same speed (median of our estimates over the 20 models that fit entirely in memory on both at Q4_K_M or the closest available quant).

Reference model
Qwen3.5 9B at Q4_K_M, the largest model that fits entirely in memory on both at Q4_K_M or the closest available quant
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
est. 51.1 tok/s (45.0–57.2, calibrated estimate ±12%)
RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
est. 51.1 tok/s (45.0–57.2, calibrated estimate ±12%)
Prompt processing on Qwen3.5 9B
RTX 5060 Ti 8GB: about 2,588 tok/s (1,553–3,623, rough estimate ±40%); RTX 5060 Ti 16GB: about 2,588 tok/s (1,553–3,623, rough estimate ±40%)

Specs side by side

Specs of the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
SpecRTX 5060 Ti 8GBRTX 5060 Ti 16GBDifference
Memory8 GB16 GB+8 GB on the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s448.0 GB/sSame
FP16 compute23.7 TFLOPS23.7 TFLOPSSame
Launch year20252025—
Price$429 street (as of 2026-08-09)$569 street (as of 2026-08-09)—
Public benchmark results0 results4 results—

Verdicts at a glance

Out of 58 models at Q4_K_M (or the closest available quant) with 8k context.

  • RTX 5060 Ti 8GBRuns great20 modelsRuns well10 modelsRuns slowly14 modelsWon't run14 models
  • RTX 5060 Ti 16GBRuns great28 modelsRuns well9 modelsRuns slowly11 modelsWon't run10 models

How to read the verdicts

Runs great
Fully on the GPU at 20 tok/s or more
Runs well
Fully on the GPU at 8–20 tok/s; MoE experts in system RAM at 20 tok/s or more; or at least 90% on the GPU at 8 tok/s or more
Runs slowly
2–8 tok/s; CPU-only; less than 90% on the GPU; or MoE experts in system RAM below 20 tok/s
Won't run
Does not fit, or under 2 tok/s

Where the verdicts differ

15 models get a different verdict on the two.

Scroll sideways to see every column.

Models whose verdict differs between the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
ModelRTX 5060 Ti 8GB verdictRTX 5060 Ti 8GB speedRTX 5060 Ti 16GB verdictRTX 5060 Ti 16GB speed
gpt-oss-20bMXFP4
Runs well
est. 43.9 tok/s30.7–57.1theoretical estimate ±30%
111.6 tok/s8k estimate 104.3 tok/s (83.5–125.2, calibrated estimate ±20%)measured (1 run, 2k context)
Kanana 1.5 15.7B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 42.6 tok/s29.8–55.3theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 89.1 tok/s71.3–106.9calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.1 tok/s7.3–10.9calibrated estimate ±20%
est. 30.3 tok/s26.7–34.0calibrated estimate ±12%
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.4 tok/s6.6–12.2theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 30.8 tok/s21.5–40.0theoretical estimate ±30%
Phi-4Q4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 8.1 tok/s6.5–9.8calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs great
est. 29.2 tok/s25.7–32.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Gemma 3 12BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 21.8 tok/s17.5–26.2calibrated estimate ±20%
est. 40.0 tok/s35.2–44.8calibrated estimate ±12%
Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B ThinkingQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 94.7 tok/s66.3–123.1theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 147.7 tok/s118.2–177.2calibrated estimate ±20%
Gemma 4 12BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 31.7 tok/s25.4–38.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs great
est. 43.2 tok/s38.0–48.4calibrated estimate ±12%
K2-Horizon MoVA 36B-A4BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.6 tok/s6.7–12.5theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 30.7 tok/s21.5–39.9theoretical estimate ±30%
Mistral Small 3.2 24BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 4.3 tok/s3.4–5.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs well
est. 14.8 tok/s11.8–17.7calibrated estimate ±20%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 8.4 tok/s6.7–10.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs well
est. 29.6 tok/s26.0–33.1calibrated estimate ±12%
EXAONE 4.5 33BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry IQ4_XS: Runs slowly
est. 3.4 tok/s2.8–4.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 5.6 tok/s4.5–6.7calibrated estimate ±20%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 4.6 tok/s3.7–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 4.5 tok/s3.6–5.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3 32BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 4.6 tok/s3.7–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 4.5 tok/s3.6–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
Granite 4.2 30BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 5.5 tok/s4.4–6.6calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 5.8 tok/s4.7–7.0calibrated estimate ±20%

Every model on both

Scroll sideways to see every column.

58 models, sorted by the better verdict of the two, then by model size
ModelRTX 5060 Ti 8GB verdictRTX 5060 Ti 8GB speedRTX 5060 Ti 16GB verdictRTX 5060 Ti 16GB speed
gpt-oss-20bMXFP4
Runs well
est. 43.9 tok/s30.7–57.1theoretical estimate ±30%
111.6 tok/s8k estimate 104.3 tok/s (83.5–125.2, calibrated estimate ±20%)measured (1 run, 2k context)
Kanana 1.5 15.7B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 42.6 tok/s29.8–55.3theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 89.1 tok/s71.3–106.9calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.1 tok/s7.3–10.9calibrated estimate ±20%
est. 30.3 tok/s26.7–34.0calibrated estimate ±12%
HyperCLOVA X SEED Think 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.4 tok/s6.6–12.2theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 30.8 tok/s21.5–40.0theoretical estimate ±30%
Phi-4Q4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 8.1 tok/s6.5–9.8calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs great
est. 29.2 tok/s25.7–32.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Gemma 3 12BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 21.8 tok/s17.5–26.2calibrated estimate ±20%
est. 40.0 tok/s35.2–44.8calibrated estimate ±12%
Mellum2.1 12B-A2.5B ThinkingQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 94.7 tok/s66.3–123.1theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 147.7 tok/s118.2–177.2calibrated estimate ±20%
Gemma 4 12BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 31.7 tok/s25.4–38.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs great
est. 43.2 tok/s38.0–48.4calibrated estimate ±12%
Qwen3.5 9BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 51.1 tok/s45.0–57.2calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 51.1 tok/s45.0–57.2calibrated estimate ±12%
K2-Horizon 7BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 46.1 tok/s40.6–51.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 46.1 tok/s40.6–51.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Qwen3 8BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 50.3 tok/s44.2–56.3calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 50.3 tok/s44.2–56.3calibrated estimate ±12%
DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 50.3 tok/s44.2–56.3calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 50.3 tok/s44.2–56.3calibrated estimate ±12%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
Kanana 1.5 8BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
Llama 3.1 8BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
est. 52.3 tok/s46.0–58.6calibrated estimate ±12%
Gemma 4 E4BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 87.2 tok/s61.0–113.3theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 87.2 tok/s61.0–113.3theoretical estimate ±30%
Ling-3.0 TinyQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 250.3 tok/s175.2–325.4theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 250.3 tok/s175.2–325.4theoretical estimate ±30%
Gemma 4 E2BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 158.9 tok/s111.2–206.6theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 158.9 tok/s111.2–206.6theoretical estimate ±30%
Qwen3.5 4BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 101.2 tok/s89.1–113.4calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 101.2 tok/s89.1–113.4calibrated estimate ±12%
Nanbeige4.2 3BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 51.2 tok/s35.8–66.5theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 51.2 tok/s35.8–66.5theoretical estimate ±30%
Spark-X2.5 4BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 108.1 tok/s95.1–121.0calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 108.1 tok/s95.1–121.0calibrated estimate ±12%
Llama 3.2 3BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 106.0 tok/s93.2–118.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 106.0 tok/s93.2–118.7calibrated estimate ±12%
LFM2.5 2.6BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 173.8 tok/s121.7–226.0theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs great
est. 173.8 tok/s121.7–226.0theoretical estimate ±30%
MiniCPM5 2BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 164.0 tok/s144.3–183.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 164.0 tok/s144.3–183.7calibrated estimate ±12%
HyperCLOVA X SEED 1.5BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 172.8 tok/s152.0–193.5calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 172.8 tok/s152.0–193.5calibrated estimate ±12%
EXAONE 4.0 1.2BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 238.8 tok/s210.1–267.4calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 238.8 tok/s210.1–267.4calibrated estimate ±12%
Llama 3.2 1BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 290.8 tok/s255.9–325.7calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 290.8 tok/s255.9–325.7calibrated estimate ±12%
MiniCPM5 1BQ4_K_M
Runs great
est. 351.8 tok/s309.6–394.1calibrated estimate ±12%
Runs great
est. 351.8 tok/s309.6–394.1calibrated estimate ±12%
K2-Horizon MoVA 36B-A4BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 9.6 tok/s6.7–12.5theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 30.7 tok/s21.5–39.9theoretical estimate ±30%
Qwen3.5 35B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 48.3 tok/s33.8–62.8theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 62.4 tok/s43.7–81.1theoretical estimate ±30%
Qwen3.6 35B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 52.5 tok/s36.7–68.2theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 69.5 tok/s48.7–90.4theoretical estimate ±30%
MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 54.5 tok/s38.2–70.9theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 74.7 tok/s52.3–97.1theoretical estimate ±30%
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 37.3 tok/s26.1–48.5theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 50.8 tok/s35.6–66.0theoretical estimate ±30%
Qwen3 30B-A3B (2507)Q4_K_M
Runs well
est. 37.1 tok/s26.0–48.3theoretical estimate ±30%
est. 57.7 tok/s40.4–75.1theoretical estimate ±30%
Gemma 4 26B-A4BQ4_K_M
Runs well
est. 37.6 tok/s26.3–48.8theoretical estimate ±30%
Runs well
est. 59.2 tok/s41.4–76.9theoretical estimate ±30%
Mistral Small 3.2 24BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 4.3 tok/s3.4–5.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs well
est. 14.8 tok/s11.8–17.7calibrated estimate ±20%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 8.4 tok/s6.7–10.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs well
est. 29.6 tok/s26.0–33.1calibrated estimate ±12%
EXAONE 4.5 33BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry IQ4_XS: Runs slowly
est. 3.4 tok/s2.8–4.1calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 5.6 tok/s4.5–6.7calibrated estimate ±20%
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 4.6 tok/s3.7–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 4.5 tok/s3.6–5.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3 32BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 4.6 tok/s3.7–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 4.5 tok/s3.6–5.5calibrated estimate ±20%
EXAONE 4.0 32BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.1 tok/s2.5–3.7calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 6.1 tok/s4.9–7.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Gemma 4 31BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.3 tok/s2.7–4.0calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 7.0 tok/s5.6–8.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Muse Glimmer 30BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.9 tok/s3.1–4.6calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 9.5 tok/s7.6–11.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Granite 4.2 30BQ4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 5.5 tok/s4.4–6.6calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 5.8 tok/s4.7–7.0calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3.5 27BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.7 tok/s3.0–4.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 8.9 tok/s7.1–10.7calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3.6 27BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.8 tok/s3.0–4.6calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 9.5 tok/s7.6–11.4calibrated estimate ±20%
Qwen3.8 27BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.6 tok/s2.9–4.3calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 8.4 tok/s6.7–10.0calibrated estimate ±20%
Gemma 3 27BQ4_K_M
Runs slowly
est. 3.8 tok/s3.1–4.6calibrated estimate ±20%
Runs slowly
est. 9.7 tok/s7.8–11.7calibrated estimate ±20%
GLM-5.3 FlashQ4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731MXFP4
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
Solar Open 2 250BIQ4_XS
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
Ling-3.0 FlashQ4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
Qwen3.5 122B-A10BQ4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
Laguna S 2.1Q4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't run
—
gpt-oss-120bMXFP4
Won't run
——
Solar Open 100BQ4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 18.7 tok/s13.1–24.4theoretical estimate ±30%
Kolibri 1Q4_K_M
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs well
est. 55.3 tok/s38.7–71.9theoretical estimate ±30%
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs well
est. 63.3 tok/s44.3–82.3theoretical estimate ±30%
Llama 3.3 70BQ4_K_M
Won't run
—
Won't runTry Q2_K (heavy quality loss): Runs slowly
est. 2.5 tok/s2.0–3.1calibrated estimate ±20%

Models with a thinking mode spend extra tokens thinking, so their speed thresholds are 1.5× stricter (30 / 12 / 3 tok/s). With thinking turned off, a model may do one grade better.

Public benchmarks

Measured results on the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB

No public measurements for this device yet.

Measured results on the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

Measured results on the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
ModelQuantBackendContextPrompt (tok/s)Generation (tok/s)FlagsSourceMeasured
llama-2-7bQ4_0llama.cpp5123,737.090.9—github.com2025-08-02
gpt-oss-20bMXFP4llama.cpp2k3,821.0111.6—github.com2025-08-20
Qwen3.8 27BUD-IQ4_XSllama.cpp8k—27.6KV q8_0github.com2026-10-11
Qwen3 8BQ4_K_XLllama.cpp4k2,965.069.2CUDAhardware-corner.net2025-12-09

Public benchmarks we calibrate against. Their conditions (context, backend, flags) can differ from the estimates above.

Frequently asked questions

Which is faster for local LLMs, the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB or the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB?

The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB generate text at about the same speed (median of our estimates over the 20 models that fit entirely in memory on both at Q4_K_M or the closest available quant). Estimated speed on Qwen3.5 9B at Q4_K_M: the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB est. 51.1 tok/s (45.0–57.2, calibrated estimate ±12%); the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB est. 51.1 tok/s (45.0–57.2, calibrated estimate ±12%).

What is the largest model each can run entirely in memory?

The RTX 5060 Ti 8GB fits Gemma 4 12B at IQ4_XS (6.38 GB file) entirely in 8 GB, at est. 48.1 tok/s (42.4–53.9, calibrated estimate ±12%). The RTX 5060 Ti 16GB fits Muse Glimmer 30B at IQ4_XS (15.44 GB file) entirely in 16 GB, at est. 20.2 tok/s (17.7–22.6, calibrated estimate ±12%).

How many local LLMs run well on each?

At Q4_K_M with 8k context, out of 58 tracked models: the RTX 5060 Ti 8GB — 20 Runs great, 10 Runs well, 14 Runs slowly, 14 Won't run; the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB — 28 Runs great, 9 Runs well, 11 Runs slowly, 10 Won't run. 15 models get a different verdict.

Speeds are estimates from memory bandwidth, calibrated against public benchmarks, and each one comes with an error band and a confidence label. Real results vary with drivers, backend, context length and thermals.

More on each